Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 22(1): 189, 2022 04 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2038687

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children below 5 years of age. METHODS: This multisite prospective observational study was carried out in the Pediatrics' out-patient departments of 5 medical colleges across India with an objective to assess the feasibility of establishing Acute Respiratory Infection Treatment Unit (ATU) in urban medical college hospitals. ATU (staffed with a nurse and a medical officer) was established in the out-patient areas at study sites. Children, aged 2-59 months, with cough and/ breathing difficulty for < 14 days were screened by study nurse in the ATU for pneumonia, severe pneumonia or no pneumonia. Diagnosis was verified by study doctor. Children were managed as per the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The key outcomes were successful establishment of ATUs, antibiotic usage, treatment outcomes. RESULTS: ATUs were successfully established at the 5 study sites. Of 18,159 under-five children screened, 7026 (39%) children were assessed to have ARI. Using the WHO criteria, 938 were diagnosed as pneumonia (13.4%) and of these, 347 (36.9%) had severe pneumonia. Ambulatory home-based management was done in 6341 (90%) children with ARI; of these, 16 (0.25%) required admission because of non-response or deterioration on follow-up. Case-fatality rate in severe pneumonia was 2%. Nearly 12% of children with 'no pneumonia' received antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Setting up of ATUs dedicated to management of ARI in children was feasible in urban medical colleges. The observed case fatality, and rate of unnecessary use of antibiotics were lower than that reported in literature.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia , Respiratory Tract Infections , Acute Disease , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Infant , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , World Health Organization
2.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 834039, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1775739

ABSTRACT

Background: Few single center studies from resource-poor settings have reported about the epidemiology, clinical feature and outcome of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). However, larger data from multi-center studies on the same is lacking including from Indian setting. Methods: This retrospective collaborative study constituted of data collected on MIS-C from five tertiary care teaching hospitals from Eastern India. Children ≤ 15 years of age with MIS-C as per the WHO criteria were included. Primary outcome was mortality. Results: A total of 134 MIS-C cases were included (median age, 84 months; males constituted 66.7%). Fever was a universal finding. Rash was present in 40%, and conjunctivitis in 71% cases. Gastro-intestinal and respiratory symptoms were observed in 50.7% and 39.6% cases, respectively. Co-morbidity was present in 23.9% cases. Shock at admission was noted in 35%, and 27.38% required mechanical ventilation. Fifteen (11.2%) children died. The coronary abnormalities got normalized during follow-up in all except in one child. Initial choice of immunomodulation had no effect on the outcomes. Presence of underlying co-morbidity, lymphopenia, thrombocytosis, hyponatremia, increased LDH (>300 U/L), and hypoalbuminemia were the factors significantly associated an increased mortality. Conclusions: MIS-C has myriad of manifestations. Underlying co-morbidity, lymphopenia, thrombocytosis, hyponatremia, increased LDH (>300 U/L), and hypoalbuminemia were associated with an increased mortality. No difference in outcome was noted with either steroid or IVIg or both. Coronary artery abnormalities resolved in nearly all cases.

3.
Future Virol ; 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1549117

ABSTRACT

Aim: To study the association between non-SARS, non-MERS human coronavirus (HCoV) infections and Kawasaki disease (KD). Methods: Meta-analysis of observational studies published until 1 May 2021. Results: Out of 571 papers retrieved through database search, 10 provided data of 17,732 children. Age ranged from 2 months-14.9 years with 66% being male and 71% being complete KD. Compared with controls, there was an increased risk of developing KD in those detected to have HCoV infection (OR: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.06-4.99]; p = 0.03). The GRADE evidence for all outcomes was of 'low-certainty'. Conclusion: A 'low certainty' of evidence suggests an increased risk of KD in children infected with HCoV. We need multi-center, prospective studies to support or refute this finding. PROSPERO protocol registration: CRD42021251582.

4.
J Glob Infect Dis ; 13(1): 33-35, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1383957

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The nonzoonotic (nonsevere acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)/Middle East respiratory syndrome) human coronaviruses (HCoVs) are usually considered as the causative agent for acute respiratory infection. We studied the characteristics and outcome of children with non-SARS HCoV acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study from a tertiary care teaching hospital in eastern India. RESULTS: Of 137 samples tested positive for respiratory viruses, 13 were due to HCoV (7 boys, median age: 2 years). Cough was the most common symptom, followed by breathing difficulty and fever. An underlying comorbid condition present in 38.4%. Co-infection with other viruses was seen in 69% of cases. Chest radiograph was abnormal in 69.3% of children. Antibiotics were administered in 53.8%. The median length of hospitalization was 5 d, irrespective of underlying disease. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HCoV is an uncommon but increasingly recognized cause of ALRI in hospitalized children. No severe illness was found in children with underlying comorbidities. This study underscores the importance of HCoV in causation of childhood ALRI, necessitating a surveillance system in India.

5.
J Trop Pediatr ; 67(3)2021 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1276236

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of large multicentric studies in children with COVID-19 from developing countries. We aimed to describe the clinical profile and risk factors for severe disease in children hospitalized with COVID-19 from India. METHODS: In this multicentric retrospective study, we retrieved data related to demographic details, clinical features, including the severity of disease, laboratory investigations and outcome. RESULTS: We included 402 children with a median (IQR) age of 7 (2-11) years. Fever was the most common symptom, present in 38.2% of children. About 44% had underlying comorbidity. The majority were asymptomatic (144, 35.8%) or mildly symptomatic (219, 54.5%). There were 39 (9.7%) moderate-severe cases and 13 (3.2%) deaths. The laboratory abnormalities included lymphopenia 25.4%, thrombocytopenia 22.1%, transaminitis 26.4%, low total serum protein 34.7%, low serum albumin 37.9% and low alkaline phosphatase 40%. Out of those who were tested, raised inflammatory markers were ferritin 58.9% (56/95), c-reactive protein 33.3% (41/123), procalcitonin 53.5% (46/86) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) 76%. The presence of fever, rash, vomiting, underlying comorbidity, increased total leucocyte count, thrombocytopenia, high urea, low total serum protein and raised c-reactive protein was factors associated with moderate to severe disease. CONCLUSION: Fever was the commonest symptom. We identified additional laboratory abnormalities, namely lymphopenia, low total serum protein and albumin and low alkaline phosphatase. The majority of the children were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. We found high urea and low total serum protein as risk factors for moderate to severe disease for the first time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Child , Humans , India/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
6.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 38(3 & 4): 265-272, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-914618

ABSTRACT

As anti-malarial drugs have been found to inhibit Corona viruses in vitro, studies have evaluated the effect of these drugs inCOVID-19 infection. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies published till June 2020. Patients with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) infection were included. The drugs used in the intervention group are Chloroquine (CQ)/Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with or without Azithromycin. The primary outcome is time to achieve virological cure. Of 1040 citations, 11 studies provided data of 1215 patients. Compared to control, CQ/HCQ has no significant effect on the time to negative COVID-19 RT-PCR results, neither in clinical trials (mean difference [MD] 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.7 to 3.79; P = 0.18; n = 180), nor in observational studies (MD 1.14; 95%CI - 11.98 to 14.26; P = 0.86, n = 407). CQ/HCQ did not affect the virological cure after day 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28; except after day 5, as shown by a single small non-randomised trial (odds ratio [OR] 9.33; 95% CI 1.51 to 57.65; P = 0.02, n = 30). Pooled data from 2 observational studies showed a significant effect of CQ/HCQ on virological cure by after day 10 (OR 7.86; 95% CI 4.4 to 14.04, P < 0.001, n = 373) and day 14 (OR 6.37; 95% CI 3.01 to 13.48, P < 0.001, n = 407). The GRADE evidence generated was of "very low-quality/certainty". To conclude, CQ/HCQ does not affect the time to virological cure compared to usual/standard of care in COVID-19 infection. Recurrent infection in a smaller number of patients was noted in the CQ/HCQ group. As the evidence generated was of "very low-quality/certainty)", large good quality studies are needed to confirm the present findings.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
8.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 482, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-722325

ABSTRACT

Background: Anti-malarial drugs inhibit coronaviruses in-vitro. Few published studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of COVID-19 infection. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies. Major database searches were carried out up until June 5, 2020. Participants admitted with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS Cov-2 (COVID-19) infection were included. The "Intervention group" received anti-malarial drugs with or without other drugs (Azithromycin) administered as an adjunct to the standard treatment/care. The "Control group" received treatment except anti-malarial drugs. The primary outcome is "all-cause mortality." Secondary outcome measures were effects on clinical and laboratory parameters and adverse events. Results: Of 3,472 citations, 17 (six clinical trials and 11 observational studies) studies provided data of 8,071 participants. Compared to the control, Hydroxy-chloroquine (HCQ) has no significant effect on mortality [(OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.46-1.64); eight observational studies; N = 5,944]. Data from a single, small non-randomized trial (N = 42) also reached a similar conclusion (OR 1.94; 95% CI 0.07-50.57; p = 0.69). Compared to the control, HCQ plus Azithromycin (AZM) significantly increased mortality [(OR 2.84; 95% CI 2.19-3.69); four observational studies; N = 2,310]. Compared to the control, risk of any adverse event was significantly increased in HCQ group [(OR 3.35; 95% CI 1.58-7.13); four clinical trials; N = 263]. Compared to control, risk of adverse cardiac events (abnormal ECG, arrhythmia, or QT prolongation) were not significantly increased in HCQ group (but significantly increased in the HCQ plus AZM group). The GRADE evidence generated for all the outcomes was of "very low-quality." Conclusions: As very low quality evidence suggests an increased risk of mortality and adverse event with HCQ plus Azithromycin combination (not HCQ alone), caution should be exercised while prescribing this combination for treatment of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 infection. Good quality, multi-centric RCTs (including both hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients) are required for any firm recommendation to be made during the ongoing pandemic. OSF Protocol Registration Link: https://osf.io/6zxsu.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL